Skip to main content

T1 · Comparison

Best PayHOA Alternative for Self-Managed HOAs

§ 1 · Verdict

Pick them if
their workflow is already the board's source of truth.

Pick both if
the board needs a transition period.

Pick Gavelhouse if
reserve discipline and board evidence are the requirement.

TLDR

PayHOA is purpose-built for HOAs and raised a $27.5M Series A in May 2024, so it is not going anywhere. All features are included at every tier starting at $49/mo for up to 25 units (annual billing). The gap is not in what PayHOA charges, but in what it covers: reserve tracking is partial -- through the accounting module with custom chart of accounts -- but there is no dedicated reserve study module, no percent-funded dashboard, and no fund separation enforcement.

Quick Verdict

PayHOA is purpose-built for HOAs and raised a $27.5M Series A in May 2024, so it is not going anywhere. All features are included at every tier starting at $49/mo for up to 25 units (annual billing). The gap is not in what PayHOA charges, but in what it covers: reserve tracking is partial -- through the accounting module with custom chart of accounts -- but there is no dedicated reserve study module, no percent-funded dashboard, and no fund separation enforcement.

Monthly cost
PayHOA $49/mo (<=25 units)
Gavelhouse $14.50-$149.50/mo billed annually with LAUNCH50
Setup fee
PayHOA Varies
Gavelhouse $0
Reserve fund compliance
PayHOA No
Gavelhouse Built-in, state-specific
Fund accounting
PayHOA No reserve separation
Gavelhouse True fund isolation
Owner portal
PayHOA Limited
Gavelhouse Full self-service
Built for
PayHOA Professional management
Gavelhouse Volunteer boards

Gavelhouse offers reserve fund compliance and true fund accounting at $14.50-$149.50/mo billed annually with LAUNCH50 with zero setup fees, vs. PayHOA at $49/mo (<=25 units).

What PayHOA does well

PayHOA is purpose-built for HOAs — not adapted from rental property management software — which puts it ahead of platforms like Buildium and AppFolio that bolt HOA features onto a rental-first product. PayHOA raised a $27.5M Series A in May 2024, so the company has runway. G2 reviews average 4.6/5 across roughly 75 reviews; Capterra averages approximately 4.5/5 across roughly 70 reviews.

All features are included at every pricing tier. There is no feature gating: a community on the $49/mo plan gets the same capabilities as a larger community paying more. Online dues collection works. The violation tracking module covers the basics. Homeowner portals let residents check their account balance and submit requests without emailing the board directly. The 30-day trial includes the 30-day money-back guarantee.

For a small community that mainly needs to collect assessments and manage ARC requests, PayHOA holds up.

Where it runs short for self-managed boards

Self-managed boards carry fiduciary responsibility without professional management staff. That creates compliance risks PayHOA addresses only partially.

Reserve tracking is partial. PayHOA tracks reserves through its accounting module with custom chart of accounts and bank syncing. You can create separate reserve categories and connect bank accounts. But there is no dedicated reserve study module, no percent-funded dashboard, and no fund separation enforcement at the transaction level. The accounting tools tell you what your balance is; they do not tell you whether that balance meets your reserve study targets.

No reserve study integration. Boards that commission a reserve study cannot import component data, remaining useful life estimates, or funding projections into PayHOA. Tracking progress against the study’s recommendations requires a separate spreadsheet.

Bank integration. PayHOA’s bank integration does not cover all financial institutions. Boards that maintain reserve accounts at credit unions or community banks may not be able to pull balances directly into PayHOA, requiring manual entry and creating reconciliation risk.

How Gavelhouse approaches this

We built Gavelhouse specifically for self-managed volunteer boards. Operating and reserve funds are always separate ledgers, reserve balances stay visible for board and CPA review, and supported board votes are logged with timestamped records.

Gavelhouse does not replace a reserve study. It keeps reserve balances available for the board’s existing reserve study review process.

Who should consider switching

If your board has received a reserve study in the last three years, if your state requires a reserve disclosure at the time of unit sale, or if any board member has asked “are we liable if something goes wrong,” PayHOA is likely not enough. Those questions point to compliance needs that require dedicated reserve tracking.

Gavelhouse starts at $14.50/mo billed annually with LAUNCH50 for communities up to 50 units.

PROS & CONS

PayHOA

Pros

  • Purpose-built for HOAs (not adapted from rental software) with online dues collection and homeowner portals
  • All features included at every tier -- no feature gating or upsells
  • $27.5M Series A in May 2024 signals long-term viability; G2 4.6/5, Capterra ~4.5/5

Cons

  • No dedicated reserve study module -- reserve tracking is partial through accounting only
  • No percent-funded dashboard or fund separation enforcement at the transaction level
  • Bank integration limited to major banks; credit unions and community banks may require manual reconciliation

Q&A

Does PayHOA have reserve fund tracking?

Partial. PayHOA tracks reserves through its accounting module with custom chart of accounts and bank syncing. It does not have a dedicated reserve study module, a percent-funded dashboard, or fund separation enforcement at the transaction level. Boards in states with mandatory reserve study laws will find accounting-level tracking insufficient for compliance reporting.

Q&A

How does PayHOA pricing compare to Gavelhouse?

PayHOA starts at $49/mo for up to 25 units (annual billing) with all features included at every tier. At 100 units, effective cost is approximately $1.09/unit/mo. Gavelhouse charges $14.50-$74.50/mo billed annually flat by community size with reserve fund compliance tools included. For small communities, PayHOA's pricing is competitive. The difference is in reserve compliance features.

PayHOA starts at $49/mo for up to 25 units on annual billing, scaling by unit count with all features included at every tier. Gavelhouse includes a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Frequently asked

Common questions before you try it

Does PayHOA have reserve fund tracking?
Partial. PayHOA offers reserve tracking through its accounting module with custom chart of accounts and bank syncing, but it does not have a dedicated reserve study module, a percent-funded dashboard, or fund separation enforcement at the transaction level. Boards that need to track progress against reserve study targets will find the accounting tools insufficient for compliance reporting.
What does PayHOA charge per month?
PayHOA starts at $49/mo for up to 25 units on annual billing, scaling to roughly $0.55/unit/mo for communities over 500 units. All features are included at every tier -- no feature gating. At 100 units, the effective cost is approximately $1.09/unit/mo. Gavelhouse includes the launch guarantee and a 30-day money-back guarantee. Gavelhouse charges $14.50-$74.50/mo billed annually with LAUNCH50 by community size with no per-unit overages.
Can I switch from PayHOA to Gavelhouse without losing data?
Yes. Gavelhouse supports importing homeowner records and payment history via CSV. We built the import flow around the most common data exports from PayHOA and similar platforms.
What is the main reason boards switch away from PayHOA?
Reserve fund compliance is the most common reason. PayHOA cannot format ballot descriptions for reserve votes and does not integrate with most banks for direct reserve account pulls. Boards that get a reserve study done often find their software cannot track progress toward the study targets.

Ready to run the full board workflow in one system?

Start Free Trial

Ready to switch?

  • State-specific compliance
  • Board-ready reporting and audit packs
  • Meetings, governance, and owner workflows

§ 3 · Honest take

Honest take: some competitors win on breadth, age, or back-office depth. Gavelhouse should win only when the board needs a simpler compliance-first record.

Sources and Review Notes

Gavelhouse cites the sources used for this page and records the last review date for each reference.